With What to Lead?

I have been thinking about a helpful thing Kevin de Young wrote a few days ago and popped back into my mind today. He was writing about the particular problems of ministering the gospel in Grand Rapids, Michigan, a region steeped in a history of Reformed theology, apparently. It was an interesting read though there is little to comment on regarding the cultural setting. We have no such history here in the West Midlands. However, his final comment struck a chord with me:

If you lead with the confessions, you will not get many converts. But if you lead with God’s glory, with Christ and his cross, with the power of the Word of God, then you’ll bring people into the church where they can eventually rest in our wonderful creeds and catechism.

Now, I love our own Confession (Westminster, in case you are wondering). I do want people to know it and to embrace it. But I think I know enough now, to whole heartedly agree with Kevin on this. I could preach doctrinally in a manner like the Dutch with their evening, catechetical preaching. Some have suggested it to me. I have even scoped out a tentative plan in the past. However – and this may be unfounded, I admit –  my great fear has been that we would lose something, maybe several things. The things that Kevin mentions.

Most of all, I want people to be gripped by the glory of God, the Cross, Christ and to hear his word. We get all that from opening up Scripture. That’s why I favour consecutive preaching through books of the Bible. It is there we see God at work, we see his glory, we are led to Christ and his cross. We glory in all of it – all the big things and all the wee details.

That’s what I want to see in our people at SPC.

And yes, then people will see how wonderful the summary confessional documents are too.

With What to Lead?

4 thoughts on “With What to Lead?

  1. Interesting dilemma.

    I think our pastor would agree with you. But there are lots of preachers who would say that the confessions are full of “God’s glory, with Christ and his cross, with the power of the Word of God”, and that it’s a false dilemma.

    I’m not sure what to think.

  2. Pete,
    Maybe. I hope I conveyed that I am tentative about it. I think Kevin is getting at what a church is known for – what’s up front. I think there is a difference between a church that is known and presents itself as a WCF/1689/3FU church and a church that has a focus on the the glory of God etc.

    Of course, I think the confessions are full of glory and there is a place for teaching them . . .

Comments are closed.